But to whom do the imaginary images of an Alice being kidnapped belong?
On the one hand, it must be Philo because our french friend has never seen Ms. Alice. Bonus points for the modesty blindfold on the one lizard guard.
On the other hand, it must be the field marshal because Philo can’t possibly underestimate Alice’s power of personality so much as to believe she could be made sacrifice of …
Those evil lizard people! How do they dare not to get her sacrificed right away? They even let her “out of the menu”, the horror!, anathema!
Perhaps the Lizardmen don’t know what they’ve got ahold of.
But to whom do the imaginary images of an Alice being kidnapped belong?
On the one hand, it must be Philo because our french friend has never seen Ms. Alice. Bonus points for the modesty blindfold on the one lizard guard.
On the other hand, it must be the field marshal because Philo can’t possibly underestimate Alice’s power of personality so much as to believe she could be made sacrifice of …
It’s a paradox!
Exactly what I was thinking
Well, the imaginary images of Alice being kidnapped belong to The Author’s desire to present more than just talkie-talk-talk.
Well, it’s nice to see Philo a little more hopeful.
He’s going to insist on running in and rescuing her, isn’t her? If she’s REALLY grateful, she might not call him an idiot for it.
Hopeful? Like hopeful that Alice would be definitively out of the picture?
It seems to fit their dynamic.
Authorial intent? Did he consult the characters first? So many questions.
Well, the characters do exist in my head, so consulting with them is easy-peasy.
Aw, I’m all caught up. Feed added. 🙂
Cool! Thanks for reading, eekee!